Those of you who’ve been paying any attention at all to the news
lately are, I’m sure, aware that in February, 17 year-old Trayvon Martin,
while walking through a Sanford, Florida community, was shot and killed by
George Zimmerman the neighborhood watch captain.
Zimmerman was taken in for questioning and subsequently released
after claiming that the shooting was in self-defense.
The events ignited a controversy, especially after Martin’s
parents obtained copies of 911 calls made by Zimmerman on the night of the
shooting. Over the subsequent 4 weeks or so, news outlets across the
country picked up the story, and groups from coast to coast weighed in on the
shooting. It got so heated and controversial that the police chief in
Sanford, Fla. resigned amid allegations that he mishandled the events, and
one radical group even offered a $10,000 bounty for the “capture of
Zimmerman” who, at the time, was in hiding. Zimmerman has subsequently
been arrested and charged with second-degree murder.
This is, by all accounts, a tragedy. But the responses to
this tragedy have ranged from interesting to downright alarming. I read
one particular story tonight that chilled me to the
core.
Bill Cosby was interviewed this week on CNN’s “State of the
Union”. The anchor asked him about the Trayvon Martin case. Cosby
responded that the issue at hand, “is not race—it’s guns.” Cosby went
on to say that, “I believe that when you tell me that you’re going to protect
the neighborhood that I live in, I don’t want you to have a
gun.”
I don’t want to get too off track here—this isn’t a political
blog, after all. But there’s a principle here that applies universally
to all societies—large societies like nations, or micro-societies like
companies.
First, I think you have to accept that freedom is a profound
concept; it’s the fuel of innovation and creativity, and is a vital
ingredient in ensuring personal happiness. Further, I contend that, as
human beings, we have a genetic thirst for freedom; so much of what we
do—even in our day-to-day lives—is about ensuring our personal, enduring
freedom. If you don’t believe that, then I’ve probably lost you already
(although, I’d love to have a chat with you about it; drop me a note).
Assuming you’re with me so far, then allow me to describe the most
paradoxical phenomenon I can imagine. We (particularly Americans—as
inhabitants of a nation that was founded not only on the principles of
personal liberty, but was only founded because of a deep, burning desire for
personal liberty) acknowledge this desire for freedom, yet our response so
often to incidents that amount to an abuse of freedom, or an irresponsible
exercise of freedom, is to throw the freedom out.
Let me try to explain: back to Cosby’s remarks. The Second
Amendment to the United States Constitution states, in part, that, “the right
of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.” Our foundational
document literally guarantees that American’s shall have the perpetual right
to have, and to bear, firearms. There’s been much political wrangling
about this issue for many years (with many nuanced views of what our
forefathers really meant when they wrote this into the constitution), but I
think when you consider this writing in light of the circumstances
surrounding our birth as a nation, it’s not too hard to discern our founders’
intent.
This isn’t a history lesson, but consider the following from the
Declaration of Independence:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal, that they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness—That
to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed,--that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these
ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish
it…” [emphasis added]
Remember that America was only born out of a general sense that
Great Britain’s policies and laws, at the time, represented oppression of the
sort that robbed Colonists of the very rights that the Declaration of
Independence claimed were unalienable. And the Founding Fathers felt
that, as citizens who are governed by their own consent, they had the right
to overthrow that government, even if by force, in the interest of affirming
those inalienable rights to our citizenry.
They were already at war with Great Britain as of this writing, and
they knew that their ability to alter or otherwise abolish the then-ruling
government, they would have to prevail in armed combat—a reality only
realizable because they, as colonists, owned arms.
I believe this is why our forefathers including the “right to keep
and bear arms” in the Constitution; they recognized that America was only
America because our Founding Fathers were able to take up arms against an
oppressive government, and they wanted to ensure that ability for the life of
our government; they not only wanted to proclaim that America was a place of
Liberty, they wanted to ensure that our citizens could forever take up arms
against our Government if our Government ever became, “destructive of these
ends.”
All that to say this: this right to bear arms is fundamental to
America; it is
why we
are what we are. It is one of the primary ingredients to the Liberty we
count so precious. It should be unconscionable when someone, on
national television, advocates for anything remotely close to eliminating the
right to keep and bear arms.
But there’s this trend—in American government, but also in
professionally managed organizations—to respond to abuses or freedom by
stripping away freedoms. This is only one example—someone exercises
their right to keep and bear arms in an irresponsible way, and immediately
someone jumps up and advocates confiscation of
firearms.
Let’s bring it closer to home: you catch someone using the
corporate account for personal items, so you eliminate all purchasing rights,
and mandate that everyone purchase through a purchasing manager, and that all
purchases need three approvals. Or you find that someone was watching
N’Sync videos on YouTube while at work, so you block out all access to video
websites from work computers. Or you find that someone was working on a
project that was a non-starter, a waste of time; so you require that everyone
get written approval before spending any time on any new
project.
All of these sound familiar, right? And you can probably
think of dozens of similar examples: this is the stuff of the “modern
organization” (and, incidentally, of a coffee-table book full of Dilbert
comics). But think about it: so much of this is simply the result of a
few people using freedom irresponsibly, and someone with some power reacting
by stripping that freedom away from everyone.
“But,” you say, “why does it matter?” It’s possible that it
doesn’t matter to anyone but me (wouldn’t be the first time I’ve been the
only weirdo standing alone on the other side of the dance hall), but I don’t
think that’s the case.
Here’s what I believe: I believe that Freedom matters. A
lot. In fact, I think it’s one of the most important things…to
everybody. Not just freedom as an abstract concept related to the laws
that govern our country, but freedom as a real, practical principle that we
encounter in virtually every interaction every single day. And here’s
why I think it matters:
1. Freedom yields happiness. I challenge you to find me a
national government that has stripped all personal, individual freedom out of
the country, yet still has happy, contended citizens. Again, each of us
has a burning, innate desire to be free.
2. Freedom brings prosperity. People do incredible and productive
things when they are free, and those incredible, productive things yield
prosperity—for them, and for those around them.
3. Freedom is efficient. Consider all those examples of organizations
stripping away freedoms in the name of “reducing risk of loss”: in all cases,
eliminating freedom involves introducing bureaucracy—the deadliest form of
waste known to human organizations. Why the “deadliest form”?
Because bureaucracy feels like the “right thing” when we are responding to
some “crisis”; but it’s almost NEVER the right thing. It is almost
always the death knell of the organization that introduces the evil
thing.
4. Freedom fosters honesty and integrity. Freedom always brings with
it a choice—and when people have a choice, when they can choose to interact
with you, or to not interact with you, you have an inherent pressure to be
truthful, and to live up to your commitments (the definition of
integrity). In the absence of a choice—when freedom is not
present—entropy often (almost always, in fact) causes you to fall out of
integrity; what you deliver fails to live up to your commitment. If you
don’t believe me, think about the last time you went to the Department of
Motor Vehicles: there’s an implicit commitment to promptly and efficiently
serve you, but can you remember a single instance where you were promptly and
efficiently served? Of course you can’t. The only reason you
accept that, though, is because you don’t have a choice in the
matter.
So, I’ve taken a long, perhaps circuitous, route to sound an
alarm: beware, business leaders, of the instinct to toss freedom out the
door. Freedom is always the right
answer.
As a parting note, allow me one final analogy: can you remember
when you first started making money? Not the lawn-mowing or
baby-sitting money you made when you were a kid; not even that first job—I
mean real money. Remember those first few paychecks? You felt
rich—even if it was only a few hundred dollars, it felt like unlimited
money.
Most of you can also probably remember (vividly) your first major
money screw-up. It was probably sometime soon after that first “real”
paycheck. Maybe it was buying that brand-new car that you’ve regretted
ever since; maybe it was the time-share for a “condo” in the Appalachians
(turned out that “condo” was a term used VERY loosely by the marketing
folks—and that the “condo” is only inhabitable during the season when the
alligators are hibernating). One way or the other, we all have paid a
little stupid tax.
Did you, upon realizing that you’d made a very foolish mistake
with your money, immediately decry money, pull all the cash out of your bank
account, and promptly start a bonfire with it? Of course not! The
fact that you were foolish and irresponsible with your money doesn’t
eliminate money's value, and it’s not a good reason for abstaining from money
for the rest of your life!
Some people will take advantage of the freedom; others will prove
irresponsible, and freedom will allow them to screw things up very
quickly. But on the whole and in the long-run, Freedom is precious, and
abuse by one is not a good reason for throwing Freedom away.
